NATIVE AMERICANS AND WATER - Created in part for the University of Washington Bothell Water and Sustainability Program.

INTRODUCTION

 

Throughout history, Native Americans have had a special relationship to their natural environment. As an essential element to the tribal way of life, the importance of water cannot be understated. Traditional tribal methods of irrigation and fishing have always relied on access to natural water resources - a right which has regularly been stripped from numerous tribes. 

 

Struggles over water between an increasingly-industrialized America and native tribes have been continual since early colonial days. The Delaware tribe, for example, was relocated at least twenty times. Needless to say, their access to essential bodies of water like Cape Henlopen and The Hudson River was severely diminished, along with their ability to sustain themselves.

 

The impact of water and its relationship to native tribes touches on the topic of dams, fishing and whaling, pollution, religion, commerce, and much more. Here you'll learn a little about some of the main topics that have been making the news. While this page is intended only to acquaint you with a variety of contemporary issues surrounding Native Americans and water, each of these topics could be discussed in great depth.

riogrande.jpg

POLLUTION

 

Though many major struggles between tribes and the government took place in colonial and frontier times, there are many new problems that have arisen in recent years. These battles are no longer fought with rifles and tomahawks, but in the courtroom. In 1998, the Supreme Court ruled that the Isleta tribe did in fact have the right to tell the city of Albuquerque what types of waste would be allowed to be dumped into the Rio Grande River (pictured above). For years, the tribe had unsuccessfully attempted to regulate the dumping of waste in the river which had been very obviously poisoning the crops and wildlife. Their success can be largely attributed to the amending of the Clean Water Act, wherein the government gave 129 tribes the right to control the quality of water from upstream that flows through tribal lands.

makahwhaling.jpg

WHALING

 

Whaling has always been a controversial and sensitive topic between tribes and the government. For years, most tribes were not allowed to have any whaling rights. Originally, whaling provided tribes with food and many of the raw materials needed for survival. While that is no longer the case, tribes have fought for whaling rights on principle, feeling that whaling practices allow them to carry on their traditions and maintain a tribal identity.

 

The Makah tribe (pictured above on a whaling training exercise) has recently enjoyed renewed whaling rights granted by the government. Those rights are, however, under attack by anti-whaling activists whose requests that their 5-year whaling permit be revoked were overturned in a federal appeals court. The Makah have traditionally smoked and pickled whale blubber for food, and have used the oil for cosmetics.

salmon.jpg

DAMS

 

The issue of dams and the environment is another important point of discussion. Since the 1980s, the government has spent several billion dollars in the Pacific Northwest to develop technology that will allow for industrialization of waterways without harming the surrounding habitat. These efforts have been largely ineffective, as the all species of salmon in Idaho, for example, are now officially endangered. Local tribes have suggested that the lower Snake River be unplugged - a controversial solution. The Bush Administration's efforts to come up with new energy development programs and continue industrial development in the Pacific Northwest seems to indicate that despite environmental concerns, there will be minimal progress in the near future towards policies that will meet the standards of local tribes.

fishingvillage.jpg

FISHING

 

For countless generations tribes have depended on fishing for survival. But as the need for electricity increased, the need for dams increased as well, choking off many of the primary rivers used by tribes. One notable example is the Cascade tribe's ongoing battle to regain fishing rights along the Columbia River. The water level behind the Bonneville Dam destroyed more than 35 Cascade tribal fishing areas. To compensate for this, the government decided that it would be sufficient to deliver dead hatchery fish with the eggs removed to the tribe for food. In 1940 the government promised to build six fishing sites for the tribe, but by the 1960 they had still only built four sites totaling less than 40 acres. It was not until 1988 when Senator Dan Evans attached an amendment to a bill requiring that the government find 360 acres for 31 new sites that the government decided to make good on its promise.

CONCLUSION

 

In the end, it seems that there will always be a fight to balance the drive towards modernization and industrialization with sensible environmental policies that meet the standards put forth by many native tribes. It's a task that will undoubtedly require the effort of our government, tribes, and us as citizens. Hopefully, together we can build an America that respects the environment, preserves native cultures, and simultaneously progresses towards meeting the needs of an industrialized society.

If you would like to support Native American tribes, click here.
 
 

MORE INFORMATION